Author |
Message |
SpecShip Complete twat

Gender: Joined: Dec 17 2005 Posts: 514 Location: 8025 - Spec Freq Offline
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:46 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: Who forgot to report? |
 |
|
|
|
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=126606&SiteID=1 _________________ Replacing yazour untill the whore returns.
"I could run a ss server on my car stereo!" -Xalimar
"Liberta tuit ma ex infernis" -Event Horizon
"I know too much about nothing." - Mine GO BOOM
"Hmm anyway, back to my kingdom hearts." - Chambahs |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
totalpwnage Newbie
Gender: Joined: Feb 17 2004 Posts: 16 Offline
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:17 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
I feel sorry for anyone who paid for any of these things. Or earlier editions.
Perfect find. Seriously perfect.
All you need to see other than the download links:
Microsoft wrote: | Until November 7, 2006, we are promotionally discounting the downloadable versions of Express to free. This doesn’t mean that the product turns off after a year, but rather that as long as you download the product before November 7, 2006, you can get it for free and you can use it forever. |
I'm downloading these and backing up all of them. I don't care that I probably won't use the majority of them, it's a good deal and who knows when you may need them. And when you do need the others, who needs the 2006 or higher version when you can save a bunch of money and just use the 2005 version you got for free?
Simply put: GO DOWNLOAD AND BACKUP EVERY SINGLE ONE NOW. If you've already bought them, sucks for you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Solo Ace Yeah, I'm in touch with reality...we correspond from time to time.

Age:38 Gender: Joined: Feb 06 2004 Posts: 2583 Location: The Netherlands Offline
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:00 am Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
wow totalpwnage ur teh k00l.
Nice Grav. Heh, MS seems to be getting some "closer-to-the-end-user" attitude as they're starting contests and giving things away for free.
I guess I like it, though.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Maverick

Age:41 Gender: Joined: Feb 26 2005 Posts: 1521 Location: The Netherlands Offline
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:17 am Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Wait.. isn't this the same as MSDE which is downloadable for free but is quite unusable since you don't have the tools to access it (apart from command line programs) which you get when you pay for it.
Aka.. Express is only a slim version of the real product and nowhere near the real product? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
newb Turds are yummy

Age:33 Gender: Joined: Mar 15 2005 Posts: 1267 Location: England Offline
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 12:18 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: Re: Who forgot to report? |
 |
|
|
|
SpecShip wrote: | http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=126606&SiteID=1 |
Nice find.  _________________ Haha SpecShip |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cyan~Fire I'll count you!

Age:37 Gender: Joined: Jul 14 2003 Posts: 4608 Location: A Dream Offline
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:35 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
The tools to access it? What do you mean, Mav? _________________ This help is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. Cyan~Fire assumes no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use.
Wise men STILL seek Him. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Muskrat Server Help Squatter

Age:38 Joined: Aug 24 2004 Posts: 829 Location: Swamp Offline
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Purge Episode I > Eposide III Jar-Jar is kool

Age:35 Gender: Joined: Sep 08 2004 Posts: 2019 Offline
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 11:25 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Yeah, D1s told me about VS C++ 2005 Express Edition (with .NET Framework), which is what I always use now. No more of that for loop bug in MSVC 6.0.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cerium Server Help Squatter

Age:43 Gender: Joined: Mar 05 2005 Posts: 807 Location: I will stab you. Offline
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:53 am Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
what for loop bug? _________________ There are 7 user(s) ignoring me right now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Purge Episode I > Eposide III Jar-Jar is kool

Age:35 Gender: Joined: Sep 08 2004 Posts: 2019 Offline
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:01 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Cerium wrote: | what for loop bug? |
In MSVC 6.0, there's a for loop "bug" that won't let the user use the same for loop declaration in the same function/event. So, you'd have to somehow rearrange the code so that there's only 1 for loop rather than 2 equal ones.
Not much of a bug, but it gets annoying.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mine GO BOOM Hunch Hunch What What

Age:42 Gender: Joined: Aug 01 2002 Posts: 3615 Location: Las Vegas Offline
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:10 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Purge+ wrote: | In MSVC 6.0, there's a for loop "bug" that won't let the user use the same for loop declaration in the same function/event. So, you'd have to somehow rearrange the code so that there's only 1 for loop rather than 2 equal ones. |
Explain a little bit. You mean this?
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
printf("Hello: %d\n", i); |
As that works fine under C++, but not under C. In C, you cannot declare a variable inside a for loop. But you can do:
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
printf("Hello: %d\n", i);
} |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Purge Episode I > Eposide III Jar-Jar is kool

Age:35 Gender: Joined: Sep 08 2004 Posts: 2019 Offline
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mine GO BOOM Hunch Hunch What What

Age:42 Gender: Joined: Aug 01 2002 Posts: 3615 Location: Las Vegas Offline
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:14 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Purge+ wrote: | This snippet was taken from a MERVBot plugin I was working on. VS 2005 compiled it perfectly, but not MSVC 6. |
Ok, thats legal and yes, MSVC 6 does fail on that. MSVC 6 handles it via placing i before the for loop, which allows you to use i outside the loop also. By doing so, it treats the next for loop as if you had another int i;, which causes the error. Thus, their method of handling it does create the correct error, but it shouldn't be handled like that (the i should only be local to the for loop). But this is because version 6 came out before this was standardized, thus they were not completely wrong.
My recommendation? Code more like C, and less like C++. Initializing variables at random locals is ugly. That is one thing I like about forcing C, as then you don't get random variables created god knows where. When working on projects, much nicer to find variables at the beginning of the scope. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cerium Server Help Squatter

Age:43 Gender: Joined: Mar 05 2005 Posts: 807 Location: I will stab you. Offline
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:21 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
You can 'fix' that in older versions (VS.Net and older) by changing some settings somewhere. I never cared enough to look myself, but thats what I hear. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cyan~Fire I'll count you!

Age:37 Gender: Joined: Jul 14 2003 Posts: 4608 Location: A Dream Offline
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:18 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
That's horrible code anyway. The second for loop is the only one that's even slightly necessary. The first should just be a memset. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Purge Episode I > Eposide III Jar-Jar is kool

Age:35 Gender: Joined: Sep 08 2004 Posts: 2019 Offline
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:37 am Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Cerium wrote: | You can 'fix' that in older versions (VS.Net and older) by changing some settings somewhere. I never cared enough to look myself, but thats what I hear. |
I tried looking around for a setting in MSVC 6 before, but I couldn't find one.
Cyan~Fire wrote: | The second for loop is the only one that's even slightly necessary. The first should just be a memset. |
There was more code of that part up more from where I pasted the code which will make your suggestion weighted.
I just posted that part to show what I basically meant by the for loop bug, not how ugly it is.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cyan~Fire I'll count you!

Age:37 Gender: Joined: Jul 14 2003 Posts: 4608 Location: A Dream Offline
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:16 am Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Yeah, of course there are occasions when multiple for loops are necessary in the same function. I just take whatever opportunity I can get to push people towards efficient coding.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|