Quote: |
Did that cause you to miss a heart beat? Smile Good, it did its job then. So what's this all about? Well the next release will not be version 2.2. Instead it's taking the codename "Olympus" and will, upon release have the version number 3.0.0. Each new release, at least each new minor revision update will take a codename.
Why are we renumbering? Well I'm sure some will say it's a ploy to try and "compete" with other boards. Many of which have upped their version numbers to stay "competitive". However this is not the core reason for our decision. We use the kernel numbering scheme. The methodology of that requires the major number to change when backward compatibility is broken. That's the case with the new release. Not one style will work "as is", practically no Mods will function. Even the language file contents and structure are completely different. This warrants, in our opinion cause to increment the major number. NB: An upgrade script will obviously be provided (and is currently in beta test) enabling you to upgrade your existing 2.x database to 3.0.0. It also reduces concern amongst our support teams coping with people noting issues with "phpBB2". A major version increment differentiates clearly between 2.x and this new release. So to reiterate very clearly, the next major release of phpBB, now 3.0.0 "Olympus" is still en-route. We are very unlikely to hit the initial window for the beta release. I would anticipate instead a late-Feb/early-March release. The final feature list is complete and work progresses on implementing as much of this as possible. Such items include (but are not limited to): Warning system Completion of report system Completion of "new" module system and updating of ACP/UCP/MCP modules Styling Permissions and a number of other minor and more significant items. Of these the ACP poses the biggest component. I can confirm that "Olympus" will feature an entirely new style produced by Tom "subblue" Bebbard, designer of subSilver. This new style will not ship with the beta, it will not ship with the release candidates. It will only ship with 3.x. This is to prevent the same situation occuring with the new style as happened with 2.x ... designers copying the style for other boards, diluting the "wow factor" upon phpBB 2's release. Such boards can go find themselves a top flight designer if they so wish. I will however say I think you'll like the new style Smile We are also considering continuing development of the 2.x line (codename yet to be decided Smile). We understand that some people will not upgrade to 3.x, they like the reduced complexity and lower feature count of 2.x ... it does "what they want" so to speak. The 2.x line would see us continue bug fixing along with the introduction, where appropriate, of elements coded for the 3.x line. Such elements could see speed and security enhancements being introduced. While retaining compatibility with the majority of Mods and styles. I say again this is not a "for sure" but it is a probability. Keep an eye on the announcements forum (or sign up to our mailing list) for further information on phpBB 3.0.0 "Olympus". |
Assassin2684 wrote: |
I dotn kno any layout at this point..i will try to think of somthing. But just a word at advice..only add a few more fourm spots if you have to becasue i ent to this one fourm and it had alot of topic things and it was a mess. |
Solo Ace wrote: |
And uhm, MGB, why are you calling your forums' visitors losers? :p |
Smong wrote: |
so I don't have to read all the spam posts like "that was me forgot to login" |
Brain's informative title wrote: |
Everything to the right of this text is 100% false |
Dr Brain wrote: |
Deceased: Gravitron.
Cause of death: Suicide. You will be missed. Bye. |
Mine Go Boom wrote: |
I try to run this without the staff being visible, so it seems as if they don't actually do anything, which I hope they never have to. |
Gravitron wrote: |
Harve Caen's site? |
Gravitron wrote: |
The situation on the forums was that they were begining to deteriorate in content (spam, threads in the wrong forums, psuedo-trash talk outside of the designated forum, excessive bashings, eruptions, etc.). And the staff was "Missing In Action", as always and so, I made this tongue in cheek, sour-sweet, bastard beat (excuse me, I'm watching a rerun of that anti-trance episode in Samurai Jack) of a post. |
Gravitron wrote: |
Without the staff being visible, said he? (actually they really did not do anything, mostly they're inactive, which is why MGB kept rehiring so many staff members over time) |
Gravitron wrote: |
Several months later, it got a bit worse and spams grew intensive and MGB forms up a prison camp out of the BBS, he of course stars as the head chief warden. He starts to slam temporary bans here, perm-bans there and insultive user-titles everywhere. Did he fairly warned anyone, did he made a post to inform people that there's a troubling increase in acitivty of the disturbance nature, did he tell the public that it reached a point where punishment has begun?
No, he did not. |
Gravitron wrote: |
Instead, he made an announcement detailing "offenders", what each did and what did they get in return.
Staff acting without presence, in stealth,...is the pot calling the cattle black? |
Gravitron wrote: |
I've been in server help for many years, prior to being staff. I did not ask to be staff, I was asked to join staff, upon accepting, I took the job seriously. I have never abused power, and I rarely used power. When I did use power, I mostly either split topics and/or moved them to the appropriate forum. |
Gravitron wrote: |
He kept teasing me, dissing me, laughing with others as they mocked me, almost encouraging them to verbaly molest me. See, his idea of backing-up his "friend"s was to help them being back-stabbed by other people. He wouldn't let me to continue as ussual, maybe he didn't really want me to get back either. |
Gravitron wrote: |
Congratulations to you, dear old friend, you have succeeded where all else've failed, you have managed to reach to me, to hurt me, you have altered that Gravitron and brought upon his discontinuance. |
Gravitron wrote: |
I suppose it is fitting, since you bring your template.sss with the use of the letter "K"cabbatS. |
MGB wrote: |
Even in the recent event with Pest you jumped right on people, though you still show the original side in which I knew you when you corrected yourself. |
Pests wrote: |
Talking about the discussion we had in the other topic? Did something else happen that I didn't know about? Why is my name linked to the admin edit? |