Server Help :: View topic - Connecting to an asss server.

Server Help

ASSS Questions - Connecting to an asss server.

i88gerbils - Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:32 pm
Post subject: Connecting to an asss server.

[Edit - Revised problem/troubleshooting]

- security.so missing from 1.1.7 source-only distrobution.
- security.so from 1.1.7 full distrobution doesn't work with 1.1.7 source-only (confirm?).
- Everything is working fine with 1.1.7 full.

Thank you for the suggestions below.

CypherJF - Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:34 pm
Post subject:

I get the same thing...

i88gerbils - Wed Jun 23, 2004 1:14 pm
Post subject:

Oh hmm.... I recieved an error when trying to load up security:contenc so I disabled it. Then wondered why I couldn't connect!

Hmm.... security:security isn't loading... unrecoverable error.

I didn't get this a year ago.

Dr Brain - Wed Jun 23, 2004 1:56 pm
Post subject:

Do you have a recent security.so?

i88gerbils - Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:38 pm
Post subject:

Yes that could be a problem. I thought it was distributed with asss? Anybody have the module?

i88gerbils - Sat Jun 26, 2004 2:10 am
Post subject:

I do not download binaries as it's a waste of my time since I compile it anyway. Might be good to include ONE binary module with that source-only distribution.

Just a suggestion before I continue on...

...

Quote:

asss 1.1.7 ...
Loading modules...
I <cmod> loading C module 'prng' from 'internal'
I <cmod> loading C module 'logman' from 'internal'
Unrecoverable error (5): Error in loading module 'security:enc_cont'

CypherJF - Sat Jun 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Post subject:

I didn't have any of those issue's using catid's or brains old binary distributions... :/

i88gerbils - Sun Jun 27, 2004 1:21 am
Post subject:

I didn't have a problem the last time I compiled asss.

Smong - Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:23 pm
Post subject:

The modules in the security file are dependant on other modules too. So if a module gets a significant change (fx: another function added to the interface) the internal version number is incremented. So there is a 'version' mismatch between the security modules you have and the rest of the server.

As a quick (and questionable) fix you could make a diff against the last working source and set all the version numbers back to how they were.

config.h wrote:

#define I_CONFIG "config-2"

i88gerbils - Tue Jun 29, 2004 5:44 pm
Post subject:

The thing is, I compiled the 1.1.7 source version, then downloaded the 1.1.7 binary distro too, unpacked the security.so, and used that.

i'll try starting over with just the 1.1.7 binaries+source, then compile the source..

Nope

Quote:

bash-2.05b# cp /home/install/asss-1.1.7/bin/security.so bin/security.so
bash-2.05b# ./bin/asss
asss 1.1.7 built at Jun 29 2004 14:49:06
Loading modules...
I <cmod> loading C module 'prng' from 'internal'
I <cmod> loading C module 'logman' from 'internal'
Unrecoverable error (5): Error in loading module 'security:enc_cont'

Modules.conf attached below.

i88gerbils - Wed Jun 30, 2004 8:17 pm
Post subject:

I'll have to wait til I get a response, but it seems to be that the source-only distrobution has some problems with security.so distributed with the binary+source distribution. I compiled the binary+source distro myself, and it worked.

1.1.7 binary+source distribution compiles and runs security.so fine, but if you combine 1.1.7 binary+source distro's security.so and the 1.1.7 source-only compile then it doesn't work? Confirm? Grelminar?

I'm not sure why this would happen if they're truly the same distribution O.o;

Jackmn - Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:54 am
Post subject:

MGB updated 1.1.7 without actually incrementing version numbers.

Perhaps he didn't update either the binary+source or source distributions? ( That is, one, but not the other )

Mine GO BOOM - Fri Jul 02, 2004 12:11 pm
Post subject:

Whoa, what? I don't touch any of the Linux end of the server, even though thats how I've played with it more lately. I just try to make sure the contenc.dll for windows is working.

If it isn't, just give me a message here on the forums, or via email, and I can pop out another one. Anyways, isn't security.c opened up completely now that the continuum part is keep in its own so/dll?

i88gerbils - Fri Jul 02, 2004 12:55 pm
Post subject:

there is no security source in 1.1.7. Or perhaps MGB lets on that he DOES have the Continuum checksum! :d

Anonymous - Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:11 pm
Post subject:

Mine GO BOOM wrote:

I can pop out another one.

This is enough proof for me that MGB has security.c and enc_cont.c (but this doesn't necessarily mean he can make a continuum client).