Er... No! It's an enhancement. It creates a new physics from scratch. It shouldn't emulate SS physics. It creates a standalone physics which could also be used in subspace but it shouldn't be like subspace physics is now.
_
If you want to see my other projects too or want to know what I'm just developing please look at my sourcecode download centre:
http://www.subspace-addicted.de.vu/downloads/
_
But please don't tell me that "wirefram.c" is trash. I know that it's trash. I'm currently developing a new solution which is a full renderer then and not only a wireframe manager (which doesn't do anything but calculation in the old version). It's also more user-friendly and not in this syntax which no one needs.
The unusual syntax and the very low use is the reason why I say the old version is "far from being a beta".
Mr Ekted - Tue Mar 16, 2004 2:38 pm
Post subject:
What i am saying is that you need LOTS more code to handle just the simple physics of SS.
Qndre - Tue Mar 16, 2004 2:47 pm
Post subject:
That may be true! Even if the physics of subspace is very primitive.