Author |
Message |
Cyan~Fire I'll count you!

Age:37 Gender: Joined: Jul 14 2003 Posts: 4608 Location: A Dream Offline
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:33 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: Can't boot Windows |
 |
|
|
|
I installed Ubuntu the other day and not GRUB won't boot Windows. Whenever I select Windows 2000, it prints the commands to the screen then hangs.
Here's some relevant info:
menu.lst wrote: | title Ubuntu, kernel 2.6.15-26-386
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.15-26-386 root=/dev/hda1 ro quiet splash
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.15-26-386
savedefault
boot
title Ubuntu, kernel 2.6.15-26-386 (recovery mode)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.15-26-386 root=/dev/hda1 ro single
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.15-26-386
boot
title Ubuntu, memtest86+
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/memtest86+.bin
boot
### END DEBIAN AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST
# This is a divider, added to separate the menu items below from the Debian
# ones.
title Other operating systems:
root
# This entry automatically added by the Debian installer for a non-linux OS
# on /dev/hda2
title Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional
rootnoverify (hd0,1)
makeactive
chainloader +1
boot |
boot.ini wrote: | [boot loader]
timeout=30
default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(2)\WINNT
[operating systems]
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(2)\WINNT="Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional" /fastdetect
|
Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 155061 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 72691 153016 40483800 83 Linux
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/hda2 * 1576 42210 20480040 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda3 42211 72686 15359873 f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda4 153016 155056 1028160 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/hda5 42211 72686 15359872+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
Partition table entries are not in disk order |
I know, my partition table's a mess. But do you have any suggestions? Thanks in advance... I'm quite frustrated. _________________ This help is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. Cyan~Fire assumes no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use.
Wise men STILL seek Him. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CypherJF I gargle nitroglycerin

Gender: Joined: Aug 14 2003 Posts: 2582 Location: USA Offline
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:59 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
If I recall correctly when my bro and I put Windows/Fedora dual boot, the Windows system had to be on the first partition otherwise it wouldn't load properly. :/ _________________ Performance is often the art of cheating carefully. - James Gosling |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cyan~Fire I'll count you!

Age:37 Gender: Joined: Jul 14 2003 Posts: 4608 Location: A Dream Offline
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:16 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Well with the glory of parted I'd be able to move around partitions, but I believe it's just the first disk, not the first partition. Otherwise how you would you ever have two version of Windows on dual-boot? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Doc Flabby Server Help Squatter

Joined: Feb 26 2006 Posts: 636 Offline
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:49 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
try this. It has a boot manager that lets u boot directly off any partiction u want.
http://ebcd.pcministry.com/
windows doesnt have to be on the first partiction.
I had windows 98, windows xp and linux installed on the same hard disk with no probs.
Just sounds like your boot record is messed up _________________ Rediscover online gaming. Get Subspace | STF The future...prehaps |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CypherJF I gargle nitroglycerin

Gender: Joined: Aug 14 2003 Posts: 2582 Location: USA Offline
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:56 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
I don't know, I never got it to work without putting Windows on the first partition then installing Fedora on the remaining. :shrug: |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cyan~Fire I'll count you!

Age:37 Gender: Joined: Jul 14 2003 Posts: 4608 Location: A Dream Offline
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:55 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Well, I think the problem was that Windows didn't like out-of-order partitions. (The Win2000 partition was first on the disk and #2.)
I erased all partitions except for the one with my data, reinstalled everything, and it worked. Time to set up Windows again. *sigh* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CypherJF I gargle nitroglycerin

Gender: Joined: Aug 14 2003 Posts: 2582 Location: USA Offline
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:40 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
ah got'cha |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|