Author |
Message |
Donkano Server Help Squatter
Gender: Joined: Jul 02 2003 Posts: 763 Offline
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:05 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: Preferred C/C++ Compiler |
 |
|
|
|
What is everyone's favourite C/C++ compiler? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
THE Lucifer You can never defeat me for I will never leave

Age:120 Joined: Nov 12 2005 Posts: 116 Location: Hell Offline
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:27 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Microsoft Visual Studio C++ (2005, 2006 when it's done beta, 2007 in the near future, 2008+ ... - 2040) _________________ Luke 10:18
He's back.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mine GO BOOM Hunch Hunch What What

Age:41 Gender: Joined: Aug 01 2002 Posts: 3615 Location: Las Vegas Offline
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:07 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Still using MSVC 6.0 for Windows, and whatever latest version of GCC on Linux. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Contempt+ Server Help Squatter
Age:36 Gender: Joined: May 15 2005 Posts: 682 Location: Home Offline
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:32 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
I use MSVS 6.0 to compile and MSC++ 2005 Express Edition to edit in C++. _________________ SSE Network Administrator |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dr Brain Flip-flopping like a wind surfer

Age:39 Gender: Joined: Dec 01 2002 Posts: 3502 Location: Hyperspace Offline
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:12 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
GCC/G++. _________________ Hyperspace Owner
Smong> so long as 99% deaths feel lame it will always be hyperspace to me |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
myke Seasoned Helper
Gender: Joined: Sep 11 2003 Posts: 142 Offline
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 12:15 am Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
GCC/G++ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cyan~Fire I'll count you!

Age:37 Gender: Joined: Jul 14 2003 Posts: 4608 Location: A Dream Offline
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:03 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
GCC/G++ (or MinGW) for favorite compiler, but I use MSVS6 because I like the IDE. _________________ This help is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. Cyan~Fire assumes no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use.
Wise men STILL seek Him. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D1st0rt Miss Directed Wannabe

Age:37 Gender: Joined: Aug 31 2003 Posts: 2247 Location: Blacksburg, VA Offline
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:49 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
I like Visual Studio 2005 better than 2003 _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr Ekted Movie Geek

Gender: Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 1379 Offline
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:15 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
D1st0rt wrote: | I like Visual Studio 2005 better than 2003 |
Is there any real additional functionality? I don't do MFC or .NET. I disable all the auto-complete stuff. I don't like all the bloat stuff (27 toolbars, etc). So what's in 2005 that's worth getting for me? I bet you have to jump through hoops just to make a raw Win32 app any more. _________________ 4,691 irradiated haggis! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bak ?ls -s 0 in

Age:26 Gender: Joined: Jun 11 2004 Posts: 1826 Location: USA Offline
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:59 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
why don't you use autocomplete? I think it speeds up programming by a lot. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr Ekted Movie Geek

Gender: Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 1379 Offline
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 12:05 am Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Bak wrote: | why don't you use autocomplete? I think it speeds up programming by a lot. |
I disable all that shit in Word as well. If I type "teh", I mean "teh" dammit!
Besides, 90% of programming is not typing on the keyboard; it's pacing around and thinking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D1st0rt Miss Directed Wannabe

Age:37 Gender: Joined: Aug 31 2003 Posts: 2247 Location: Blacksburg, VA Offline
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 10:25 pm Post maybe stupid Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
2005 to me seems a lot less cluttered and much faster. I'm also not afraid to accidentally have it open a single file anymore because it starts up pretty much as fast as TextPad with no solution. I remember 2003 as taking up to 10 seconds just for a single header file. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|