Server Help

Mr Ekted · Movie Geek Gender: Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 1379 Offline

State 3 ways that the following code can ever exit. Crashing or terminating the process does not count. If this is too easy for you, don't give away the answers. Let others try.

Code: Show/Hide

a = 1;

while (a)
b++;

// how do we get here?

_________________
4,691 irradiated haggis!

CypherJF · Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 1:01 pm *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

<comment>Nice post #666.

</comment>
_________________
Performance is often the art of cheating carefully. - James Gosling

Bak · Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 5:31 pm *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

(answers attached so as to not ruin problem)

Mr Ekted · Movie Geek Gender: Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 1379 Offline

Good but there are more.

tansey · Novice Joined: Nov 03 2004 Posts: 53 Offline

besides the 3 thrown up there, couldn't you also overload the class of a's '=' operator to set it to 0 if rvalue is 1?

Bak · Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 11:50 pm *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

perhaps, but that would be operator overloading again. I wonder what function the while(a) would call... does it do a != 0 so operator!= or perhaps it does a cast to a bool... if so than what would it do in c... where there are no bool's (integer cast?). Ekted probably would know.

Similarly you could use #define in a few different ways to get the desired result.

A different solution would be to start a different thread that does

while (1)
a = 0;

forever and that should do it... assuming a is a global variable... unfortunately I can't seem to find a simple c++ example showing multithreading, so I don't know exactly what the syntax would be... I guess it's the idea that counts though.

50% Packetloss · Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:49 am *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

#define while(a) while(0)
#define b++ break

Good game sons!!

Edit: Damn, didnt read your post, guess you already found these answers

Mr Ekted · Movie Geek Gender: Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 1379 Offline

Clue:

volatile int a;

SuSE · Me measures good Joined: Dec 02 2002 Posts: 2307 Offline

I know!

Code: Show/Hide

50% Packetloss · Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:24 pm *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

You could use __asm to have the program self-modify itself. Maybe even have another thread edit the value of a while the program is in the loop, I dont know enough about multi-threading though. I tried looking up the volatile stuff and its beyond me.

Bak · Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:36 pm *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

volatile looks like it prevents the comipler from optimizing certain values by having it always read them from memory, rather than store in registers. Using volatile values and multithreading it looks like we could change a in different thread

Code: Show/Hide

volatile int a;

ThreadFunc()
{
while(1)
a = 0;
}

int main()
{
int b;
startThread(&ThreadFunc);

a = 1;

while (a)
b++;

return 0;
}

again, the exact syntax is beyond me. use AfxBeginThread or something like that if you use MFC and #include <windows.h>.

The assembly self modifing solution is a funny one 50%.

Mr Ekted · Movie Geek Gender: Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 1379 Offline

Good work everyone. This concludes the exercise.

D1st0rt · Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 10:49 pm *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

couldn't you just step over it in a debugger?
_________________

1stStrike · Cute like a kitty Joined: Dec 28 2002 Posts: 427 Offline

psh. programming! who needs programming anyway? software is for the weak!

Cyan~Fire · Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 11:04 pm *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

D1s, I don't think you quite understand the debugger commands. You can't just skip a section of code, that would cause quite a few problems and wouldn't be too useful. The only call it skipping because it's going too fast to see.

(My wacko explanation)
_________________
This help is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. Cyan~Fire assumes no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use.
Wise men STILL seek Him.

D1st0rt · Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 11:06 pm *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

ok, I really have no knowledge of debuggers since nothing I've done has been complex enough to require serious use... I just saw the "step over" button in VS

Mr Ekted · Movie Geek Gender: Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 1379 Offline

Dr Brain · Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 7:15 am *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

In assembly debuggers, you can change the PC register and that will skip commands. I'm not sure I've ever seen that functionality on a 8086 debugger, but it's probably there.

But you can do it on some embedded system debuggers, because they give you the ability to manually change all of the registers.
_________________
Hyperspace Owner

Smong> so long as 99% deaths feel lame it will always be hyperspace to me

Mr Ekted · Movie Geek Gender: Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 1379 Offline

EIP is the program counter for Intel. In VC you can edit registers simply by typing new values for them.

Dr Brain · Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:12 am *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

Oh? Interesting. I've been working mostly with Motorola chips thus far.

Never really used Microsoft's debugger, either.

Purge · Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:18 pm *Post maybe stupid* Post subject:

Damn smart people...