Server Help :: View topic - LVZ Suite (Project moved to another site 8.11.2004)

Server Help

Misc User Apps - LVZ Suite (Project moved to another site 8.11.2004)

craigg - Sun Apr 18, 2004 3:41 pm
Post subject: LVZ Suite (Project moved to another site 8.11.2004)

Moved all resources to:
http://www.mdevx.com/other/devx/czarchitect/projectstatus.htm

SuSE - Sun Apr 18, 2004 3:58 pm
Post subject:

promising gui

what's with the greenland.1.1.1.3.243543654324755247245 name?

Mine GO BOOM - Sun Apr 18, 2004 4:50 pm
Post subject:

Akai wrote:

what's with the greenland.1.1.1.3.243543654324755247245 name?

Probably build number, and maybe something to do with a timestamp probably. Usually people will do the 1.X.X Build #, not this method.

CypherJF - Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:01 pm
Post subject:

Looking promising! keep up the good work

myke - Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:15 pm
Post subject:

man...you people and your .net :\ make me download the framework >:O i hate .net

CypherJF - Sun Apr 18, 2004 8:12 pm
Post subject:

I think you can request the .NET stuff on a CD from microsoft, if you want to pay the 10$ or w/e..

D1st0rt - Sun Apr 18, 2004 8:55 pm
Post subject:

I think it's just that he's a hater

myke - Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:27 am
Post subject:

CypherJF wrote:

I think you can request the .NET stuff on a CD from microsoft, if you want to pay the 10$ or w/e..

man i'm on dsl fuck 10$ for a piece of shit that just wastes 30+ mb of space they act like .net is somethin special...it's like mfc...just another way for microsoft to try to dominate by making things easier

D1st0rt wrote:

I think it's just that he's a hater

no i'm not a hater...microsoft just needs to stop with their trying to dominate, personally i'd rather write 100 lines of code to make somethin that .NET or MFC can do in 1-10 lines because MFC and .NET are for people who don't want to learn the way it should be done

Cyan~Fire - Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:41 pm
Post subject:

.NET is not like MFC. .NET is a whole new set of functions and utilities. MFC is a object-oriented wrapper of the Windows API. Different functions, different languages.

.NET is actually a pretty nice invention, you can do a lot with it. I personally don't like it because of it's windows-centricness.

myke - Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:25 pm
Post subject:

Cyan~Fire wrote:

.NET is not like MFC. .NET is a whole new set of functions and utilities. MFC is a object-oriented wrapper of the Windows API. Different functions, different languages.

i didn't mean they were similar i meant microsoft made both to try to dominate the market even more

Smong - Tue Apr 20, 2004 9:18 am
Post subject:

Hrm, what if Continuum 0.39 comes out as requiring .NET? I think a lot of players will be lost.

SuSE - Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:01 pm
Post subject:

...lol, it won't

Anonymous - Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:21 pm
Post subject:

sidenote: a group of individual's have wrote a .NET port to linux, so .NET will be able to be used on that platform. I forget what it's called but .. yeah

Anonymous - Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:16 pm
Post subject:

Mono(.net), and it's ghetto

Dr Brain - Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:59 pm
Post subject:

There is also .gnu, but I know nothing about it or Mono.

Cyan~Fire - Tue Apr 20, 2004 5:52 pm
Post subject:

You can't really blame MS for trying to dominiate the market. MFC was actually not an attempt to dominate, just an attempt to 'upgrade' their object-orientation support. I consider it a downgrade though, lol. And .NET is, like I said, pretty useful if you don't care too much about other OSes.

Anonymous - Thu Apr 22, 2004 4:36 pm
Post subject:

Like OMG finally. I hope this mean that I can finally build more complex level much easier. One of the things I am trying to do is, Because I am a bid DSB fan, and make a new, Super DSB Map, but I have be running into limitation with the current tile set. The solution is to add the additional tiles as background images. But there lies the problem. Any one ever that has ever had to add background images knows what I am talking about. To make matters worse since the map is in development, I need to move stuff around fairly frequently. Keep up the good work, hope to see a full functioning version soon.

2dragons - Thu Apr 22, 2004 6:11 pm
Post subject:

Cool to see someone else doing this. I've also been developing a lvl/lvz editor in java (sux for distribution for newbies) however hopefully some people can use it.

It currently has pretty much full lvl support and some lvz support working.

Cyan~Fire - Thu Apr 22, 2004 6:17 pm
Post subject:

Java doesn't suck for distribution, it sucks in general.

Java is like a vehicle that can run on train tracks, drive on roads, fly, 'swim', and sail. You think it's going to do any of those effeciently or even well? Nuh uh.

But nice going, craigg!

SuSE - Thu Apr 22, 2004 7:19 pm
Post subject:

the cool thing about java is that it'll work on any OS
the thing about SubSpace/Continuum is that'll only work on Windows

but, hey, maybe someone'll get that Linux version out eventually and there'll be some Linux mapping apps, too

oh and 2d, keep me in mind for testing?

craigg - Fri May 07, 2004 1:17 am
Post subject:

Just wanted to let you all know that I hate special tile objects.

That's all.

Anonymous - Tue May 11, 2004 12:36 pm
Post subject: word

craigg is taking all the glory, it was my idea and my code.

craigg - Tue May 11, 2004 12:38 pm
Post subject:

Evil.

Anonymous - Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:34 am
Post subject:

i hate them too, and i hate little red radar boxes.

Anonymous - Fri Jun 18, 2004 2:19 am
Post subject:

Is there going to be another release soon?

craigg - Sat Jun 19, 2004 10:45 pm
Post subject:

Yes... 1 to 2 weeks.

CypherJF - Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:33 pm
Post subject:

Semi functional? I hope so $$

I really can't wait for a LVZ+LVL editor...

Anonymous - Fri Jul 02, 2004 6:03 pm
Post subject:

Er whered you get the tileset? I made the walls on that like 2 years ago..

At first I thought it was complete, but I guess not;(

The interface sort of confused me..

Anonymous - Mon Jul 19, 2004 4:46 am
Post subject:

It good too know that this is moving along. Any ideas on future releases?

a_bug - Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:38 pm
Post subject:

i just want to know whos legs i have to break if next version of SS comes with .NET

CypherJF - Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:07 pm
Post subject:

Lets stop from going off track. The Next version of SS comes out: will probably be never. As BDE owns Subspace.

Continuum however, I am about 99.999999999999999999999->infinity% sure, it will never use .NET.

However, if I understood or am remembering right, this app is done in vb6; so no .NET here either.

craigg - Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:06 am
Post subject:

Quote:

It good too know that this is moving along. Any ideas on future releases?

I simply update it as I have time.

Quote:

this app is done in vb6; so no .NET here either.

This app is actually pure .NET Native... so far.

CypherJF - Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:17 am
Post subject:

O haha I mistaken this for the other LVZ project going on, which is built w/ VB6. haha my bad

Solo Ace - Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:33 am
Post subject:

N0b.

The only 'N0b' I see is you

, jk.
message edited by cypherjf due to a lack of sanity

You ass, stop touching my posts.
I'll edit you.

CypherJF - Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:26 am
Post subject:

^---- mgb will prob take my powers away for affecting free-will. LOL

- lol -
</end junked posts>
<continue real-revelant conversation here>

Anonymous - Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:56 pm
Post subject:

Or change your title.

Anyway isn't visual studio 7/2003 using .NET? I think that's the package that comes with vb, vc, etc, right?

D1st0rt - Sat Jul 24, 2004 5:42 pm
Post subject:

VB7 is part of .NET, yes

craigg - Sun Sep 19, 2004 2:44 pm
Post subject:

Just thought I would show you the latest addition to the set of tools being designed... I think it will be named, "FPS Killer" ;)