Trash Talk - Vanishing time OutlawGene - Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:26 am Post subject: Vanishing time
The present can be represented as a fraction of a second per present that is a still image that changes between frames of movement. The previous present frame comes after the present frame of time and vanishes as the past. The past frames aren't stored or saved because if you gave them all movement they would have to restart somehow because they would have to end. They would end if started or continued normally on track or backwards but if the past was played backwards it would have to turn back and play forwards eventually and then it would catch up to the past and if it doesn't then there would be sitting still time between the past and the present. If time were connected like on a line you would need enough space for the past to exist in the timeline. The past covers all space in existing planets and in outer space. You would need multiple universes and the past would have to be connected. The universe each past frame resides in could not connect properly to another past frame that may be a tiny fraction different. It would have to fit on the side or at the top, bottom, or on the right of the past frame. How does the past disappear instantly after the present is visited? Think of it as a flat box with no sides with the present laid flat over the box and moving off into nowhere not even to bottom of the fat box. The edges are the end of the tape. This is just something I thought of earlier this year that I went back to and retyped my final draft. This is all skeptical so you should be too. Tell me what you think?
Cheese - Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject:
your mind would explode if u tried to figure this out.
so u must think conceptually.
youre trying to assign a spacial value to something that does not exist in space.
also, youre assuming time has a finite beginning and ending
and even more foolishly believe that it would reverse direction when it reaches an endpoint.
consider a 2d guy moving around, and having more 2d planes/frames stacked on top of each other to form a 3d cube.
now expand this into 4 dimensions.
my thoughts:
#1: FUCKING USE PUNCTUATION AND LINE BREAKS. WTF.
#2: ARE U FUCKING HIGH?
OutlawGene - Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:31 am Post subject:
I was explaining that the past can't exist with the present because time can't be always moving in the past and present or time and if it does then time would collide or seperate.
