Dr Brain wrote: |
Eclipse is probably the best IDE in the world. |
tcsoccerman wrote: |
=
@ cyan-fire : c# is certainly easy. i'm not looking for an easier language, but a more powerful language like c or c++. |
Doc Flabby wrote: |
Theres very litte you can't do in c# than you can't do in c/c++. c# is more than capable of producing an animated statistics program. |
Doc Flabby wrote: |
Subspace API and distort wrote a chat client in c# |
Code: Show/Hide /// <summary>
/// Much thanks to Coconut Emulator and CatId without which this class would not be possible. /// </summary> |
Cyan~Fire wrote: |
[..]
Not really true. C# exchanges power for simplicity. You can't do quite as much in C# because you don't manage pointers yourself. |
Cyan~Fire wrote: |
Java would, of course, be preferable since it's more portable, but making UIs is much harder. Out of all the common languages, making UIs is by far the easiest in C#. |
CypherJF wrote: |
I don't believe the .NET framework has been ported to all the other OS' that the JRE can run on. |
Doc Flabby wrote: |
Actually thats not a good arguement. In c# you can choose to use "unsafe" code and choose to manage pointers yourself, and then theres all sorts of fun you can get up to, but if you were going to do any of those things I think you be better just using c. It defeats the whole point of using a managed language ![]() |
Animate Dreams wrote: |
[..]
Obviously not all, that's why I said "almost". As long as it runs on the major OSes, especially if it's a client program, that's all you need. Not many people run Solaris 5 as a desktop computer, for example. |
Cyan~Fire wrote: |
the Win32 API from C#.) It's a big pain, very ugly, |